Upon leafing through the mail on Friday 13 March, Coburg residents were likely met with a notice from Moreland Council announcing that there would be changes to parking limits in the area. The more watchful Coburg local may have heard rumblings of these changes back in July 2018, when the Council drafted the now-adopted ‘Moreland Integrated Transport Strategy’ (MITS). This strategy mentioned introducing better parking management in Moreland as a way to encourage residents of Moreland to reduce their reliance on cars and to use more sustainable modes of transport.
The new parking changes will bring 2-hour parking limits to all unrestricted street parking within roughly 200 metres of the ‘Coburg Activity Centre’ (and other ‘activity centres’ around Moreland). The Coburg Activity Centre is the term the Council uses to refer to a large misshapen zone that captures various pockets of land close to Sydney Rd, stretching from Batman Station down to Moreland Station. The Council have identified the regions within this zone as being important to focus on for development, protection and growth.
At the February Council meeting this year a large number of residents waited patiently to air their concerns about the new changes. Older residents were concerned that a mainstay of their social life – lengthy community club events and functions – would be negatively impacted. Local school workers raised the fact that under the new rules some staff members would miss out on permits. They also pointed out that parents would be discouraged from volunteering their time to assist with school programs. A number of residents raised the safety issue for women required to move their cars late at night (at this stage the parking limits were from 8am-11pm; they have now been made 8am-8pm). There were also people with big families who were concerned that the limit on permits available for residents would mean their adult children would be encouraged to leave home. Finally, there were calls to reopen public consultation on the matter.
James Conlan, from the cyclist advocacy group, the Moreland BUG, says that whilst he supports efforts to reduce reliance on cars in Moreland, he is frustrated by the MITS. “If the intent is to achieve genuine modal shift, alongside the drastic parking changes we’re seeing, there needs to be a similar drastic increase in the funding of cycling and walking routes, and that’s not what we’re seeing”. James’ main concern is that the new parking changes have taken the entire focus of Council and are sidelining the other elements of the MITS plan that are crucial to its success. “Usually every decade the Moreland Council creates a 10-year bike plan for Moreland detailing the things they want to fund, but this year it has been dropped and no proper strategy has taken its place” he says.
The Council have justified the changes by claiming that limits on parking around the ‘Coburg Centre’ will go towards the bigger plan to ‘encourage sustainable transport, like walking, cycling, and public transport’ in accordance with the MITS. This is undeniably a valuable cause. There are too many cars on our roads, and there are not nearly enough safe cycling and walking lanes. It is also clear that parking limits can contribute to the goal of reducing cars. However, Coburg’s current infrastructure is not set up to support the different modes of transport the Council wants us to start using. Sydney road is only well-lit from Munro to Bell St, and the surrounds are notoriously dangerous. The buses only travel the main roads, and the tram and trains in the area are amongst the slowest and most infrequent services in Melbourne. Cyclists in Coburg have been calling for dedicated bike lanes and safe bike paths for decades due to dangerous road conditions. Limited car usage in an area ill-suited for alternative modes of transport creates more problems than it solves.
The parking limits were set to be introduced from May of this year, but due to the current global crisis, Council have said they will delay implementation until the end of the year or until the state of emergency is over.
WHY START WITH PARKING?
The Council’s decision to start implementing parking restrictions without equally meaningful engagement and investment in the other elements of the MITS plan is curious. While the Council may just consider the move to be low-hanging fruit, it may instead be owing to another scheme approved by the Council; the Central Coburg 2020 Structure Plan.
The stated goal of this plan, adopted in 2006, is to regenerate Coburg by developing the area to include more accommodation and retail space in the activity centre. Shortly after the plan was adopted, the Council purchased back the site of the notorious ‘second’ Coles of Coburg — the smaller, less stocked and less frequented Coles. Before this, Council had leased the site to a BiLo store. Incredibly, in 1980 BiLo had negotiated a whopping 99-year long lease with the Council which included the enormous car park area. Whatever caused this epic deal to transpire, it was far from the minds of Council in 2006 when they announced the ending of the onerous contract. They claimed the move was in pursuit of the then newly adopted plan which specifically refers to the ‘open lot car parking’ around the Coburg Activity Centre as not supporting ‘the mixture and intensity of uses which could support a more vibrant local economy’. Furthermore, supporting documentation for the development plan mentions that ‘much of the proposed retail, commercial (and possibly residential) development will be built on current car parking allotments’ in Central Coburg.
With these moves to enable development of Coburg in mind, the rationale for the recent parking changes being strictly about fulfilling the MITS seems less clear. It’s clear that the Council is looking to develop the big car parks in the ‘Coburg Activity Centre’ (like the one between the two Coles’), and they are hoping to avoid the impact that reduced car parks will have on the surrounding residential streets.
If the introduction of parking limits around Coburg is in pursuit of alleviating long-term parking of Coburg Central users in the close-by residential streets, this needs to be communicated. If development will negatively impact residents, it should be openly spoken about and residents should be given the opportunity to respond. Instead, the parking limits are being presented solely as a move to increase sustainability. Ironically, this move to become more environmentally sustainable is also paving the way for developers to increase Coburg’s traffic.