Melbourne Airport’s unpopular new proposal
In an unprecedented display of public-spiritedness, Melbourne Airport has recently launched a ‘community newsletter’. Residents of Merri-bek who have read their copy will now be aware of the airport’s runway expansion plans, which are looking to go ahead despite persistent protest from environmental groups.
By way of context, Melbourne Airport has been a two-runway operation since it was opened in 1971. The original runways have been extended over the decades in order to accommodate bigger planes and more traffic.
Recently, Melbourne Airport has re-ignited a proposal to build a third runway in order to increase the capacity of the airport. Melbourne Airport states that the introduction of a third runway will allow an additional 136,500 aircraft movements a year. In their report on the project, Melbourne Airport noted that ‘this represents 40 per cent more passengers and 43 per cent more aircraft movements’.
This isn’t the first time Melbourne Airport has proposed a third runway. The original plans for the airport formulated in the late 1950s made provisions for the future introduction of a third and fourth runway. Melbourne Airport has been making formal steps towards actualising this dream since they drafted plans in 2013. In fact, in their community newsletter, Melbourne Airport mentions that they have futureproofed their plans to accommodate a fourth runway.
Environmental groups have railed against a third runway since Melbourne Airport began advertising its plans. No 3rd Tulla Runway (‘N3TR’) is one such group. N3TR points to air travel being one of the big contributors to climate change. According to a recent EU report, there are significant CO2 and non-CO2 climate impacts from aviation. The International Civil Aviation Organization has recently estimated that if aviation operations stay on their current trajectory, emissions could triple by 2050 from 2015 levels, even taking into account the potential development of newer fuel-related technologies.
With the federal and state government committing to net zero emissions by 2050, it seems like a corollary to this commitment would be to reduce the potential for corporations (like airlines, who are not held accountable for failing their own set emissions goals) to increase harmful and largely unfettered operations.
This may be a convincing argument to take up with a government body, however in 1997, Melbourne Airport was privatised. Operations were then entrusted to the Australia Pacific Airports Corporation (APAC), who signed a 50 year lease with the Australian Government.
In Australia, very few regulatory limits currently exist on emissions from corporations.
According to a report compiled by APAC, the two runways will exceed their operational capacity by 2026, and a third runway is therefore crucial to meet future needs. APAC expects that the additional runway will bring in 23 million more passengers a year, and also an additional 136,500 aircraft movements per year. To put this into perspective, last year, there were almost 13 million passengers, and almost 127,000 aircraft movements at the airport. APAC is therefore seeking to facilitate an enormous increase in emissions from aircrafts by roughly 2026-7, when the third runway will likely be constructed if the development is approved.
Under the Airports Act 1996, the Melbourne Airport is required to provide the Federal Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development (currently Catherine King) with a master plan every 5 years, and if there are large developments, a major development plan must also be approved. Recently, the federal minister approved the master plan from APAC, and is due to consider the major development plan regarding the third runway.
Readers may know that in September 2022, the federal government passed the Climate Change Act 2022. This act legislates Australia’s commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. How the government intends to achieve this whilst approving major works to increase profits and growth for corporations like APAC remains to be seen.
What is clear, is that there is a troubling rhetoric adopted by companies and government alike, that attempts to reassure both environmentalists and shareholders. There will be net zero emissions and growth. There will be another runway, but emissions will be reduced.
An interesting comparative analysis can be made by looking to the UK. In 2020, Heathrow Airport’s third runway plan was ruled unlawful due to its disregard of the government’s climate change commitments as outlined specifically in the Paris Climate Agreement. While the decision was later overruled by the Supreme Court on the basis that the Paris Agreement was not incorporated into domestic law and therefore does not constitute government policy, legal battles, among other factors, have significantly delayed the project which has yet to go ahead. Hopefully, Melbourne Airport’s plans face similar and bigger hurdles, now that Australia’s Paris Climate commitments have now been expressly adopted in the Climate Change Act 2022.
N3TR is currently pushing for an independent environmental impact assessment of greenhouse emissions which would result from the project, and an assessment on the effect on neighbouring woodland.
If the environmental destruction is not enough to light your fires, according to an interactive third runway flight path tool on Melbourne Airport’s website, the new third runway will introduce a flightpath directly over Coburg. This means more noise, and more social media posts from locals asking why there are so many planes in the sky.
One other thing we learned from Melbourne Airport Community Newsletter is that they will be popping up at the Midsumma Carnival in late January to talk to festival goers about their (the Airport’s, unfortunately) plans.
By Edwina Snagge